Abstract
The expression "named entity" is very fuzzy and its definitions partly contradictory. Semantic subtleties involving the words "entity", "name" and "term" are largely ignored.
Based on formal ontology a more principled typology is introduced.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{schulz:DagSemProc.08131.9,
author = {Schulz, Stefan},
title = {{Named Entity or Entity Name?}},
booktitle = {Ontologies and Text Mining for Life Sciences : Current Status and Future Perspectives},
pages = {1--1},
series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
ISSN = {1862-4405},
year = {2008},
volume = {8131},
editor = {Michael Ashburner and Ulf Leser and Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2008/1521},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-15214},
doi = {10.4230/DagSemProc.08131.9},
annote = {Keywords: Ontology, Named Entity Recognition}
}
Keywords: |
|
Ontology, Named Entity Recognition |
Collection: |
|
08131 - Ontologies and Text Mining for Life Sciences : Current Status and Future Perspectives |
Issue Date: |
|
2008 |
Date of publication: |
|
03.06.2008 |