License: 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2022.12
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-161391
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2022/16139/
Bernardini, Giulia ;
Chen, Huiping ;
Loukides, Grigorios ;
Pissis, Solon P. ;
Stougie, Leen ;
Sweering, Michelle
Making de Bruijn Graphs Eulerian
Abstract
A directed multigraph is called Eulerian if it has a circuit which uses each edge exactly once. Euler’s theorem tells us that a weakly connected directed multigraph is Eulerian if and only if every node is balanced. Given a collection S of strings over an alphabet Σ, the de Bruijn graph (dBG) of order k of S is a directed multigraph G_{S,k}(V,E), where V is the set of length-(k-1) substrings of the strings in S, and G_{S,k} contains an edge (u,v) with multiplicity m_{u,v}, if and only if the string u[0]⋅ v is equal to the string u⋅ v[k-2] and this string occurs exactly m_{u,v} times in total in strings in S. Let G_{Σ,k}(V_{Σ,k},E_{Σ,k}) be the complete dBG of Σ^k. The Eulerian Extension (EE) problem on G_{S,k} asks to extend G_{S,k} with a set ℬ of nodes from V_{Σ,k} and a smallest multiset ? of edges from E_{Σ,k} to make it Eulerian. Note that extending dBGs is algorithmically much more challenging than extending general directed multigraphs because some edges in dBGs are by definition forbidden. Extending dBGs lies at the heart of sequence assembly [Medvedev et al., WABI 2007], one of the most important tasks in bioinformatics. The novelty of our work with respect to existing works is that we allow not only to duplicate existing edges of G_{S,k} but to also add novel edges and nodes, in an effort to (i) connect multiple components and (ii) reduce the total EE cost. It is easy to show that EE on G_{S,k} is NP-hard via a reduction from shortest common superstring. We further show that EE remains NP-hard, even when we are not allowed to add new nodes, via a highly non-trivial reduction from 3-SAT. We thus investigate the following two problems underlying EE in dBGs:
1) When G_{S,k} is not weakly connected, we are asked to connect its d > 1 components using a minimum-weight spanning tree, whose edges are paths on the underlying G_{Σ,k} and weights are the corresponding path lengths. This way of connecting guarantees that no new unbalanced node is added. We show that this problem can be solved in ?(|V|klog d+|E|) time, which is nearly optimal, since the size of G_{S,k} is Θ(|V|k+|E|).
2) When G_{S,k} is not balanced, we are asked to extend G_{S,k} to H_{S,k}(V∪ℬ,E∪?) such that every node of H_{S,k} is balanced and the total number |?| of added edges is minimized. We show that this problem can be solved in the optimal ?(k|V| + |E|+ |?|) time. Let us stress that, although our main contributions are theoretical, the algorithms we design for the above two problems are practical. We combine the two algorithms in one method that makes any dBG Eulerian; and show experimentally that the cost of the obtained feasible solutions on real-world dBGs is substantially smaller than the corresponding cost obtained by existing greedy approaches.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{bernardini_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2022.12,
author = {Bernardini, Giulia and Chen, Huiping and Loukides, Grigorios and Pissis, Solon P. and Stougie, Leen and Sweering, Michelle},
title = {{Making de Bruijn Graphs Eulerian}},
booktitle = {33rd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2022)},
pages = {12:1--12:18},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-234-1},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2022},
volume = {223},
editor = {Bannai, Hideo and Holub, Jan},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2022/16139},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-161391},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2022.12},
annote = {Keywords: string algorithms, graph algorithms, Eulerian graph, de Bruijn graph}
}
