License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.31
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-169695
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2022/16969/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal


Cáceres, Manuel ; Cairo, Massimo ; Grigorjew, Andreas ; Khan, Shahbaz ; Mumey, Brendan ; Rizzi, Romeo ; Tomescu, Alexandru I. ; Williams, Lucia

Width Helps and Hinders Splitting Flows

pdf-format:
LIPIcs-ESA-2022-31.pdf (1 MB)


Abstract

Minimum flow decomposition (MFD) is the NP-hard problem of finding a smallest decomposition of a network flow X on directed graph G into weighted source-to-sink paths whose superposition equals X. We focus on a common formulation of the problem where the path weights must be non-negative integers and also on a new variant where these weights can be negative. We show that, for acyclic graphs, considering the width of the graph (the minimum number of s-t paths needed to cover all of its edges) yields advances in our understanding of its approximability. For the non-negative version, we show that a popular heuristic is a O(log |X|)-approximation (|X| being the total flow of X) on graphs satisfying two properties related to the width (satisfied by e.g., series-parallel graphs), and strengthen its worst-case approximation ratio from Ω(√m) to Ω(m / log m) for sparse graphs, where m is the number of edges in the graph. For the negative version, we give a (⌈log ║X║⌉+1)-approximation (║X║ being the maximum absolute value of X on any edge) using a power-of-two approach, combined with parity fixing arguments and a decomposition of unitary flows (║X║ ≤ 1) into at most width paths. We also disprove a conjecture about the linear independence of minimum (non-negative) flow decompositions posed by Kloster et al. [ALENEX 2018], but show that its useful implication (polynomial-time assignments of weights to a given set of paths to decompose a flow) holds for the negative version.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{caceres_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2022.31,
  author =	{C\'{a}ceres, Manuel and Cairo, Massimo and Grigorjew, Andreas and Khan, Shahbaz and Mumey, Brendan and Rizzi, Romeo and Tomescu, Alexandru I. and Williams, Lucia},
  title =	{{Width Helps and Hinders Splitting Flows}},
  booktitle =	{30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2022)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-247-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{244},
  editor =	{Chechik, Shiri and Navarro, Gonzalo and Rotenberg, Eva and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2022/16969},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-169695},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Flow decomposition, approximation algorithms, graph width}
}

Keywords: Flow decomposition, approximation algorithms, graph width
Collection: 30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2022)
Issue Date: 2022
Date of publication: 01.09.2022


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI