License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2022.41
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-173263
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2022/17326/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal


Qi, Benjamin

On Maximizing Sums of Non-Monotone Submodular and Linear Functions

pdf-format:
LIPIcs-ISAAC-2022-41.pdf (0.8 MB)


Abstract

We study the problem of Regularized Unconstrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedUSM) as defined by [Bodek and Feldman '22]. In this problem, we are given query access to a non-negative submodular function f: 2^N → ℝ_{≥ 0} and a linear function ?: 2^N → ℝ over the same ground set N, and the objective is to output a set T ⊆ N approximately maximizing the sum f(T)+?(T). Specifically, an algorithm is said to provide an (α,β)-approximation for RegularizedUSM if it outputs a set T such that E[f(T)+?(T)] ≥ max_{S ⊆ N}[α ⋅ f(S)+β⋅ ?(S)]. We also study the setting where S and T are constrained to be independent in a given matroid, which we refer to as Regularized Constrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedCSM).
The special case of RegularizedCSM with monotone f has been extensively studied [Sviridenko et al. '17, Feldman '18, Harshaw et al. '19]. On the other hand, we are aware of only one prior work that studies RegularizedCSM with non-monotone f [Lu et al. '21], and that work constrains ? to be non-positive. In this work, we provide improved (α,β)-approximation algorithms for both {RegularizedUSM} and {RegularizedCSM} with non-monotone f. In particular, we are the first to provide nontrivial (α,β)-approximations for RegularizedCSM where the sign of ? is unconstrained, and the α we obtain for RegularizedUSM improves over [Bodek and Feldman '22] for all β ∈ (0,1).
In addition to approximation algorithms, we provide improved inapproximability results for all of the aforementioned cases. In particular, we show that the α our algorithm obtains for {RegularizedCSM} with unconstrained ? is essentially tight for β ≥ e/(e+1). Using similar ideas, we are also able to show 0.478-inapproximability for maximizing a submodular function where S and T are subject to a cardinality constraint, improving a 0.491-inapproximability result due to [Oveis Gharan and Vondrak '10].

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{qi:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2022.41,
  author =	{Qi, Benjamin},
  title =	{{On Maximizing Sums of Non-Monotone Submodular and Linear Functions}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2022)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-258-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{248},
  editor =	{Bae, Sang Won and Park, Heejin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2022/17326},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-173263},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2022.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: submodular maximization, regularization, continuous greedy, inapproximability}
}

Keywords: submodular maximization, regularization, continuous greedy, inapproximability
Collection: 33rd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2022)
Issue Date: 2022
Date of publication: 14.12.2022
Supplementary Material: Software (Source Code): https://github.com/bqi343/maximizing-sums archived at: https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:0dbefd7cb01ec27b7ec94585161ada5356de2906


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI