License: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-ND 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2009.1842
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-18421
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2009/1842/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal


Elsässer, Robert ; Sauerwald, Thomas

Cover Time and Broadcast Time

pdf-format:
09001.ElsaesserRobert.1842.pdf (0.2 MB)


Abstract

We introduce a new technique for bounding the cover time of random walks by relating it to the runtime of randomized broadcast. In particular, we strongly confirm for dense graphs the intuition of Chandra et al. (1997) that ``the cover time of the graph is an appropriate metric for the performance of certain kinds of randomized broadcast algorithms''. In more detail, our results are as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item For any graph $G=(V,E)$ of size $n$ and minimum degree $\delta$, we have $\mathcal{R}(G)= \mathcal{O}(\frac{|E|}{\delta} \cdot \log n)$, where $\mathcal{R}(G)$ denotes the quotient of the cover time and broadcast time. This bound is tight for binary trees and tight up to logarithmic factors for many graphs including hypercubes, expanders and lollipop graphs.
\item For any $\delta$-regular (or almost $\delta$-regular) graph $G$ it holds that $\mathcal{R}(G) = \Omega(\frac{\delta^2}{n} \cdot \frac{1}{\log n})$. Together with our upper bound on $\mathcal{R}(G)$, this lower bound strongly confirms the intuition of Chandra et al.~for graphs with minimum degree $\Theta(n)$, since then the cover time equals the broadcast time multiplied by $n$ (neglecting logarithmic factors).
\item Conversely, for any $\delta$ we construct almost $\delta$-regular graphs that satisfy $\mathcal{R}(G) = \mathcal{O}(\max \{ \sqrt{n},\delta \} \cdot \log^2 n)$. Since any regular expander satisfies $\mathcal{R}(G) = \Theta(n)$, the strong relationship given above does not hold if $\delta$ is polynomially smaller than $n$.
\end{itemize}
Our bounds also demonstrate that the relationship between cover time and broadcast time is much stronger than the known relationships between any of them and the mixing time (or the closely related spectral gap).

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{elssser_et_al:LIPIcs:2009:1842,
  author =	{Robert Els{\"a}sser and Thomas Sauerwald},
  title =	{{Cover Time and Broadcast Time}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science},
  pages =	{373--384},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-09-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{3},
  editor =	{Susanne Albers and Jean-Yves Marion},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/1842},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-18421},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2009.1842},
  annote =	{Keywords: Random walk, Randomized algorithms, Parallel and distributed algorithms}
}

Keywords: Random walk, Randomized algorithms, Parallel and distributed algorithms
Collection: 26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
Issue Date: 2009
Date of publication: 19.02.2009


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI