Abstract
Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies.
These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be
compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on
common tests.
We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the
evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004.
We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{euzenat:DagSemProc.04391.5,
author = {Euzenat, Jerome},
title = {{Evaluating ontology alignment methods}},
booktitle = {Semantic Interoperability and Integration},
pages = {1--8},
series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
ISSN = {1862-4405},
year = {2005},
volume = {4391},
editor = {Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer and A. Sheth and S. Staab and M. Uschold},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/36},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360},
doi = {10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5},
annote = {Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment}
}
|
Keywords: |
|
evaluation , ontology alignment |
|
Collection: |
|
04391 - Semantic Interoperability and Integration |
|
Issue Date: |
|
2005 |
|
Date of publication: |
|
23.03.2005 |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)