License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.7
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66882
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2016/6688/
Ben-David, Shalev
The Structure of Promises in Quantum Speedups
Abstract
In 1998, Beals, Buhrman, Cleve, Mosca, and de Wolf showed that no super-polynomial quantum speedup is possible in the query complexity setting unless there is a promise on the input. We examine several types of "unstructured" promises, and show that they also are not compatible with super-polynomial quantum speedups. We conclude that such speedups are only possible when the input is known to have some structure.
Specifically, we show that there is a polynomial relationship of degree 18 between D(f) and Q(f) for any Boolean function f defined on permutations (elements of [n]^n in which each alphabet element occurs exactly once). More generally, this holds for all f defined on orbits of the symmetric group action (which acts on an element of [M]^n by permuting its entries). We also show that any Boolean function f defined on a "symmetric" subset of the Boolean hypercube has a polynomial relationship between R(f) and Q(f) - although in that setting, D(f) may be exponentially larger.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{bendavid:LIPIcs:2016:6688,
author = {Shalev Ben-David},
title = {{The Structure of Promises in Quantum Speedups}},
booktitle = {11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016)},
pages = {7:1--7:14},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-019-4},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2016},
volume = {61},
editor = {Anne Broadbent},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2016/6688},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-66882},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2016.7},
annote = {Keywords: Quantum computing, quantum query complexity, decision tree complexity, lower bounds, quantum adversary method}
}
Keywords: |
|
Quantum computing, quantum query complexity, decision tree complexity, lower bounds, quantum adversary method |
Collection: |
|
11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016) |
Issue Date: |
|
2016 |
Date of publication: |
|
22.09.2016 |