License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.19
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-83575
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2018/8357/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal

Berman, Itay ; Rothblum, Ron D. ; Vaikuntanathan, Vinod

Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Proximity

pdf-format:
LIPIcs-ITCS-2018-19.pdf (0.6 MB)

Abstract

Interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) are interactive proofs in which the verifier runs in time sub-linear in the input length. Since the verifier cannot even read the entire input, following the property testing literature, we only require that the verifier reject inputs that are far from the language (and, as usual, accept inputs that are in the language).

In this work, we initiate the study of zero-knowledge proofs of proximity (ZKPP). A ZKPP convinces a sub-linear time verifier that the input is close to the language (similarly to an IPP) while simultaneously guaranteeing a natural zero-knowledge property. Specifically, the verifier learns nothing beyond (1) the fact that the input is in the language, and (2) what it could additionally infer by reading a few bits of the input.

Our main focus is the setting of statistical zero-knowledge where we show that the following hold unconditionally (where N denotes the input length):
- Statistical ZKPPs can be sub-exponentially more efficient than property testers (or even non-interactive IPPs): We show a natural property which has a statistical ZKPP with a polylog(N) time verifier, but requires Omega(sqrt(N)) queries (and hence also runtime) for every property tester.
- Statistical ZKPPs can be sub-exponentially less efficient than IPPs: We show a property which has an IPP with a polylog(N) time verifier, but cannot have a statistical ZKPP with even an N^(o(1)) time verifier.
- Statistical ZKPPs for some graph-based properties such as promise versions of expansion and bipartiteness, in the bounded degree graph model, with polylog(N) time verifiers exist.

Lastly, we also consider the computational setting where we show that:
- Assuming the existence of one-way functions, every language computable either in (logspace uniform) NC or in SC, has a computational ZKPP with a (roughly) sqrt(N) time verifier.
- Assuming the existence of collision-resistant hash functions, every language in NP has a statistical zero-knowledge argument of proximity with a polylog(N) time verifier.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{berman_et_al:LIPIcs:2018:8357,
  author =	{Itay Berman and Ron D. Rothblum and Vinod Vaikuntanathan},
  title =	{{Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Proximity}},
  booktitle =	{9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-060-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{94},
  editor =	{Anna R. Karlin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2018/8357},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-83575},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Property Testing, Interactive Proofs, Zero-Knowledge}
}

Keywords: Property Testing, Interactive Proofs, Zero-Knowledge
Collection: 9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018)
Issue Date: 2018
Date of publication: 12.01.2018

DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI