License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2018.8
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-92551
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2018/9255/
van Dam, Wim ;
Wong, Raymond
Two-qubit Stabilizer Circuits with Recovery II: Analysis
Abstract
We study stabilizer circuits that use non-stabilizer qubits and Z-measurements to produce other non-stabilizer qubits. These productions are successful when the correct measurement outcome occurs, but when the opposite outcome is observed, the non-stabilizer input qubit is potentially destroyed. In preceding work [arXiv:1803.06081 (2018)] we introduced protocols able to recreate the expensive non-stabilizer input qubit when the two-qubit stabilizer circuit has an unsuccessful measurement outcome. Such protocols potentially allow a deep computation to recover from such failed measurements without the need to repeat the whole prior computation. Possible complications arise when the recovery protocol itself suffers from a failed measurement. To deal with this, we need to use nested recovery protocols. Here we give a precise analysis of the potential advantage of such recovery protocols as we examine its optimal nesting depth. We show that if the expensive input qubit has cost d, then typically a depth O(log d) recovery protocol is optimal, while a certain special case has optimal depth O(sqrt{d}). We also show that the recovery protocol can achieve a cost reduction by a factor of at most two over circuits that do not use recovery.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{vandam_et_al:LIPIcs:2018:9255,
author = {Wim van Dam and Raymond Wong},
title = {{Two-qubit Stabilizer Circuits with Recovery II: Analysis}},
booktitle = {13th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2018)},
pages = {8:1--8:21},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-080-4},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2018},
volume = {111},
editor = {Stacey Jeffery},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2018/9255},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-92551},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2018.8},
annote = {Keywords: stabilizer circuit, recovery circuit, magic state}
}
Keywords: |
|
stabilizer circuit, recovery circuit, magic state |
Collection: |
|
13th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2018) |
Issue Date: |
|
2018 |
Date of publication: |
|
16.07.2018 |