License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.49
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-112641
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2019/11264/
Go to the corresponding LIPIcs Volume Portal


Bradac, Domagoj ; Singla, Sahil ; Zuzic, Goran

(Near) Optimal Adaptivity Gaps for Stochastic Multi-Value Probing

pdf-format:
LIPIcs-APPROX-RANDOM-2019-49.pdf (0.6 MB)


Abstract

Consider a kidney-exchange application where we want to find a max-matching in a random graph. To find whether an edge e exists, we need to perform an expensive test, in which case the edge e appears independently with a known probability p_e. Given a budget on the total cost of the tests, our goal is to find a testing strategy that maximizes the expected maximum matching size.
The above application is an example of the stochastic probing problem. In general the optimal stochastic probing strategy is difficult to find because it is adaptive - decides on the next edge to probe based on the outcomes of the probed edges. An alternate approach is to show the adaptivity gap is small, i.e., the best non-adaptive strategy always has a value close to the best adaptive strategy. This allows us to focus on designing non-adaptive strategies that are much simpler. Previous works, however, have focused on Bernoulli random variables that can only capture whether an edge appears or not. In this work we introduce a multi-value stochastic probing problem, which can also model situations where the weight of an edge has a probability distribution over multiple values.
Our main technical contribution is to obtain (near) optimal bounds for the (worst-case) adaptivity gaps for multi-value stochastic probing over prefix-closed constraints. For a monotone submodular function, we show the adaptivity gap is at most 2 and provide a matching lower bound. For a weighted rank function of a k-extendible system (a generalization of intersection of k matroids), we show the adaptivity gap is between O(k log k) and k. None of these results were known even in the Bernoulli case where both our upper and lower bounds also apply, thereby resolving an open question of Gupta et al. [Gupta et al., 2017].

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{bradac_et_al:LIPIcs:2019:11264,
  author =	{Domagoj Bradac and Sahil Singla and Goran Zuzic},
  title =	{{(Near) Optimal Adaptivity Gaps for Stochastic Multi-Value Probing}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2019)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-125-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{145},
  editor =	{Dimitris Achlioptas and L{\'a}szl{\'o} A. V{\'e}gh},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2019/11264},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-112641},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: stochastic programming, adaptivity gaps, stochastic multi-value probing, submodular functions, k-extendible systems, adaptive strategy, matroid inter}
}

Keywords: stochastic programming, adaptivity gaps, stochastic multi-value probing, submodular functions, k-extendible systems, adaptive strategy, matroid inter
Collection: Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2019)
Issue Date: 2019
Date of publication: 17.09.2019


DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI