License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0)
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.13
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-112283
URL: http://dagstuhl.sunsite.rwth-aachen.de/volltexte/2019/11228/
Hulett, Reyna
Single-Elimination Brackets Fail to Approximate Copeland Winner
Abstract
Single-elimination (SE) brackets appear commonly in both sports tournaments and the voting theory literature. In certain tournament models, they have been shown to select the unambiguously-strongest competitor with optimum probability. By contrast, we reevaluate SE brackets through the lens of approximation, where the goal is to select a winner who would beat the most other competitors in a round robin (i.e., maximize the Copeland score), and find them lacking. Our primary result establishes the approximation ratio of a randomly-seeded SE bracket is 2^{- Theta(sqrt{log n})}; this is underwhelming considering a 1/2 ratio is achieved by choosing a winner uniformly at random. We also establish that a generalized version of the SE bracket performs nearly as poorly, with an approximation ratio of 2^{- Omega(sqrt[4]{log n})}, addressing a decade-old open question in the voting tree literature.
BibTeX - Entry
@InProceedings{hulett:LIPIcs:2019:11228,
author = {Reyna Hulett},
title = {{Single-Elimination Brackets Fail to Approximate Copeland Winner}},
booktitle = {Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2019)},
pages = {13:1--13:20},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-125-2},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2019},
volume = {145},
editor = {Dimitris Achlioptas and L{\'a}szl{\'o} A. V{\'e}gh},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2019/11228},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-112283},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.13},
annote = {Keywords: Voting theory, mechanism design, query complexity, approximation}
}
Keywords: |
|
Voting theory, mechanism design, query complexity, approximation |
Collection: |
|
Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2019) |
Issue Date: |
|
2019 |
Date of publication: |
|
17.09.2019 |